Skip to main content

Table 8 Treatment effects on the average math scores within treated schools, FE schools

From: Closing the achievement gap in mathematics: evidence from a remedial program in Mexico City

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Partial 1

6.859*** [0.208]

   

Partial 2

6.941*** [0.165]

1.726*** [0.273]

  

Partial 3

6.658*** [0.076]

2.007*** [0.348]

0.638*** [0.204]

0.637** [0.215]

Partial 4

6.674*** [0.067]

1.870*** [0.356

0.448*** [0.203]

0.456** [0.134]

Partial 5

6.724*** [0.101]

2.123*** [0.360]

0.591** [0.292]

0.597** [0.202]

Treatment * Partial 1

−0.527** [0.205]

   

Treatment * Partial 2

−0.637*** [0.178]

−0.095 [0.108]

  

Treatment * Partial 3

−0.396* [0.203]

0.099 [0.146]

0.216 [0.115]

0.215 [0.116]

Treatment * Partial 4

−0.121 [0.205]

0.387*** [0.158]

0.511*** [0.123]

0.507*** [0.123]

Treatment * Partial 5

0.029, 0.208

0.520*** [0.173]

0.658*** [0.142]

0.655*** [0.143]

Controls by Partial 1 grade

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Controls by trends in grades before the treatment

No

No

Yes

Yes

Controls by the interaction of trends & grade in Partial 1

No

No

No

Yes

Observations

29,410

23,528

17,646

17,646

R-squared

0.92

0.93

0.94

0.94

  1. This table reports the estimates of the treatment effect as specified in Eq. (1, 2, 3, and 4), presented in the same order in Columns (1)–(4), taking all the non-treated students of the schools in the sample as the comparison group. Standard errors are in brackets
  2. * Significant at 10 %; ** significant at 5 %; *** significant at 1 %