Skip to main content

Table 10 SP coverage and private transfers. Different effects by year

From: Does access to free health insurance crowd-out private transfers? Evidence from Mexico’s Seguro Popular

Year

OLS: amount of private transfers received

LPM: probability of receiving private transfers

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

SP * 2004

−54.11 (176.7)

38.44 (161.1)

−0.0728 (0.0467)

−0.0691 (0.0429)

SP * 2005

−49.06 (91.21)

43.41 (94.86)

−0.0736** (0.0315)

−0.0592** (0.0289)

SP * 2006

−103.6 (140.3)

15.05 (144.2)

−0.0530 (0.0405)

−0.0383 (0.0385)

SP * 2008

−212.9 (215.0)

−240.5 (210.6)

−0.0452 (0.0591)

−0.0825 (0.0532)

SP * 2010

−254.8 (153.7)

−264.5* (151.4)

−0.0240 (0.0505)

−0.0350 (0.0412)

SP * 2012

159.8 (178.0)

75.19 (178.7)

0.0008 (0.2000)

0.0292 (0.2060)

HH-level controls

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Year fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

State fixed effects

Yes

No

Yes

No

State-level controls

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Municipality fixed effects

No

Yes

No

Yes

Municipality-level controls

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Observations

54,854

54,854

54,854

54,854

  1. Source: Author’s elaboration based on the ENIGH. Figures presented represent coefficient estimates for SP coverage at the state level. HH-level controls include the variables presented in Table 2. State-level controls include the state population size and binary variables that indicate the political affiliation of the Governor. Municipality-level controls include government revenue, number of housing credits granted and number of workers affiliated to IMSS. Monetary figures are in real 2006 pesos. Standard errors are clustered at the state level