Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 SP coverage and total private transfers. Marginal effects

From: Does access to free health insurance crowd-out private transfers? Evidence from Mexico’s Seguro Popular

Variable Tobit: amount of private transfers received Logit: probability of receiving private transfers
(1) (2) (3) (4)
SP coverage at the state level −206.4** (102.2) 168.0* (87.35) −0.0669* (0.0343) −0.0654* (0.0342)
HH head age   2.111*** (0.7987)   0.0013*** (0.0003)
HH head years of schooling   9.817*** (1.973)   −0.0010* (0.0005)
HH head male   −1100.8*** (61.87)   −0.3280*** (0.0083)
HH enrolled in Prospera   −22.96* (12.63)   −0.0099** (0.0048)
HH members under age 12   −13.07** (5.812)   −0.0035 (0.0022)
HH members age 65 and older   84.34*** (15.09)   0.0391*** (0.0059)
Good quality walls in the HH   45.51 (29.37)   0.0152 (0.0123)
Good quality roofs in the HH   77.97*** (12.97)   0.0190*** (0.0053)
Good quality floors in the HH   89.17*** (14.23)   0.0341*** (0.0061)
Rural locality   150.31*** (23.73)   0.0538*** (0.0079)
Year fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
State fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
State-level controls No Yes No Yes
Municipality fixed effects No No No No
Municipality-level controls No Yes No Yes
Observations 54,854 54,854 54,854 54,854
  1. Source: Author’s elaboration based on the ENIGH. For the tobit, figures reported denote the unconditional marginal effects. HH denotes households. state-level controls include the state population size and binary variables that indicate the political affiliation of the Governor. Municipality-level controls include government revenue, number of housing credits granted and number of workers affiliated to IMSS. Monetary figures are in real 2006 pesos. Standard errors are clustered at the state level