Skip to main content

Table 4 SP coverage and total private transfers. Marginal effects

From: Does access to free health insurance crowd-out private transfers? Evidence from Mexico’s Seguro Popular

Variable

Tobit: amount of private transfers received

Logit: probability of receiving private transfers

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

SP coverage at the state level

−206.4** (102.2)

168.0* (87.35)

−0.0669* (0.0343)

−0.0654* (0.0342)

HH head age

 

2.111*** (0.7987)

 

0.0013*** (0.0003)

HH head years of schooling

 

9.817*** (1.973)

 

−0.0010* (0.0005)

HH head male

 

−1100.8*** (61.87)

 

−0.3280*** (0.0083)

HH enrolled in Prospera

 

−22.96* (12.63)

 

−0.0099** (0.0048)

HH members under age 12

 

−13.07** (5.812)

 

−0.0035 (0.0022)

HH members age 65 and older

 

84.34*** (15.09)

 

0.0391*** (0.0059)

Good quality walls in the HH

 

45.51 (29.37)

 

0.0152 (0.0123)

Good quality roofs in the HH

 

77.97*** (12.97)

 

0.0190*** (0.0053)

Good quality floors in the HH

 

89.17*** (14.23)

 

0.0341*** (0.0061)

Rural locality

 

150.31*** (23.73)

 

0.0538*** (0.0079)

Year fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

State fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

State-level controls

No

Yes

No

Yes

Municipality fixed effects

No

No

No

No

Municipality-level controls

No

Yes

No

Yes

Observations

54,854

54,854

54,854

54,854

  1. Source: Author’s elaboration based on the ENIGH. For the tobit, figures reported denote the unconditional marginal effects. HH denotes households. state-level controls include the state population size and binary variables that indicate the political affiliation of the Governor. Municipality-level controls include government revenue, number of housing credits granted and number of workers affiliated to IMSS. Monetary figures are in real 2006 pesos. Standard errors are clustered at the state level